Trevisano v. Giordano

202 A.D.2d 1071, 609 N.Y.S.2d 122
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 11, 1994·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Defendants presented evidence sufficient to demonstrate that, at the death of plaintiffs grandparents in 1949 or 1950, title to the premises vested in their children as tenants in common (see, Kraker v Roll, 100 AD2d 424, 429). It is presumed that the exclusive possession of a co-tenant is not adverse to the other tenants. Exclusive possession alone is not the equivalent of an ouster (see, Perkins v Volpe, 146 AD2d 617, lv dismissed 74 NY2d 791). Although plaintiffs parents remained in possession in excess of 10 years, the expiration of the 10-year period merely triggers the possibility of adverse possession; it does not establish it (see, Matter of Kelley, 140 Misc 2d 876, 879). Adverse possession requires "very obvious and overt acts which unmistakably repudiate a non-possessory owner’s right by one possessing the property” (Matter of Kelley, supra, at 879). We do not find, upon this record, any evidence of such acts on the part of plaintiffs parents. We conclude, therefore, that Supreme Court properly granted summary judgment to defendants. (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Kings County, Golden, J. — Dismiss Complaint.) Present — Green, J. P., Balio, Fallon, Doerr and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Trevisano v. Giordano, 202 A.D.2d 1071, 609 N.Y.S.2d 122 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

202 A.D.2d 1071 (Trevisano v. Giordano) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Golobe v. Altchek
2023 NY Slip Op 00031 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2023)
Loveless Family Trust v. Koenig
77 A.D.3d 1447 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
Gonzalez v. Gonzalez
236 A.D.2d 589 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
Perez v. Perez
228 A.D.2d 161 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)