Trevino v. Stephens

Fifth Circuit

Trevino v. Stephens

740 F.3d 378, 2014 WL 223590, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 1131

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedJanuary 21, 2014

DocketNo. 10-70004

StatusPublished

Cited by8 cases

This text of 740 F.3d 378 (Trevino v. Stephens) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Trevino v. Stephens, 740 F.3d 378, 2014 WL 223590, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 1131 (5th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

PER CURIAIH:

In light of the Supreme Court’s decision in Trevino v. Thaler, — U.S. -, 133 S.Ct. 1911, 185 L.Ed.2d 1044 (2013), we remand to the district court for full reconsideration of the Petitioner’s ineffective assistance of counsel claim in accordance with both Trevino and Martinez v. Ryan, — U.S.-, 132 S.Ct. 1309, 182 L.Ed.2d 272 (2012). If the Petitioner requests it, the district court may in its discretion stay the federal proceeding and permit the Petitioner to present his claim in state court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

PER CURIAIH:

In light of the Supreme Court’s decision in Trevino v. Thaler, — U.S. -, 133 S.Ct. 1911, 185 L.Ed.2d 1044 (2013), we remand to the district court for full reconsideration of the Petitioner’s ineffective assistance of counsel claim in accordance with both Trevino and Martinez v. Ryan, — U.S.-, 132 S.Ct. 1309, 182 L.Ed.2d 272 (2012). If the Petitioner requests it, the district court may in its discretion stay the federal proceeding and permit the Petitioner to present his claim in state court.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

740 F.3d 378, 2014 WL 223590, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 1131, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/trevino-v-stephens-ca5-2014.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack