Trevino v. Golden State FC LLC

District Court, E.D. California·Decided September 24, 2019·No. 1:18-cv-00120·Unknown

Opinion

mmaryott@gibsondunn.com ASHLEY ALLYN, SBN 254559 aallyn@gibsondunn.com 3161 Michelson Drive Irvine, CA 92612-4412 Telephone: 949.451.3800 Facsimile: 949.451.4220 JASON C. SCHWARTZ (admitted pro hac vice) jschwartz@gibsondunn.com GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP 1050 Connecticut Avenue, N.W. Washington, DC 20036-5306 Telephone: 202.955.8500 Facsimile: 202.467.0539 KATHERINE V.A. SMITH, SBN 247866 ksmith@gibsondunn.com HELEN AVUNJIAN, SBN 300284 havunjjian@gibsondunn.com GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP 333 South Grand Avenue Los Angeles, CA 90071-3197 Telephone: 213.229.7000 Facsimile: 213.229.7520 Attorneys for Defendants GOLDEN STATE FC LLC (now known as AMAZON.COM SERVICES, INC.); AMAZON.COM, INC.; and AMAZON FULFILLMENT SERVICES, INC. (now known as AMAZON.COM SERVICES, INC.) [Additional Counsel Continued on Next Page] JUAN TREVINO, CHRISTOPHER WARD, Lead Case No. 1:18-cv-00120-DAD-BAM LINDA QUINTEROS, ROMEO PALMA, Member Case No: 1:18-cv-00121-DAD-BAM Member Case No: 1:18-cv-00567-DAD-BAM GIANINI, and JUAN C. AVALOS, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Member Case No: 1:18-cv-01176-DAD-BAM Member Case No: 1:17-cv-01300-DAD-BAM Plaintiffs, v. STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER GOLDEN STATE FC LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company; AMAZON.COM INC., a Delaware Corporation, AMAZON FULFILLMENT SERVICES, INC. a Delaware Corporation, and Does 1 through 10, inclusive, Defendants. peter@dion-kindemlaw.com PETER R. DION-KINDEM, P.C. 2945 Townsgate Road, Suite 200 Westlake Village, CA 91361 Telephone: 818.883.4900 Facsimile: 858 404.9203 LONNIE C. BLANCHARD, III, SBN 93530 lonnieblanchard@gmail.com THE BLANCHARD LAW GROUP, APC 3578 East Foothill Boulevard, Suite 338 Pasadena, CA 91107 Telephone: 213.599.8255 Facsimile: 213.402.3949 Attorneys for Plaintiff Juan Trevino DAVID YEREMIAN, SBN 226337 david@yeremianlaw.com ALVIN B. LINDSAY, SBN 220236 alvin@yeremianlaw.com DAVID YEREMIAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. 535 North Brand Boulevard, Suite 705 Glendale, CA 91203-1989 Telephone: 818.230.8380 Facsimile: 818.230.0308 Attorneys for Plaintiffs Christopher Ward and Linda Quinteros JAMES HAWKINS, SBN 192925 james@jameshawkinsaplc.com ISANDRA FERNANDEZ, SBN 220482 Isandra@jameshawkinsaplc.com JAMES HAWKINS APLC 9880 Research Drive, Suite 200 Irvine, CA 92618 Telephone: 949.387.7200 Facsimile: 949.387.6676 Attorneys for Plaintiff Juan C. Avalos JOSHUA H. HAFFNER, SBN 188652 jhh@haffnerlawyers.com GRAHAM G. LAMBERT, SBN 303056 gl@haffnerlawyers.com HAFFNER LAW PC 445 South Figueroa Street, Suite 2325 Los Angeles, CA 90071 Telephone: 213.514.5681 Facsimile: 213.514.5682 Attorneys for Plaintiff Romeo Palma swestrick@westricklawfirm.com 11075 Santa Monica Boulevard, Suite 125 Los Angeles, CA 90025 Telephone: 310.746.5303 Facsimile: 310.943.3373 Attorneys for Plaintiffs Brittany Hagman and Alberto Gianini

and Local Rule 141.1 of the Local Rules of the District Court for the Eastern District of California, by and between Plaintiffs Juan Trevino, Christopher Ward, Linda Quinteros, Romeo Palma, Brittany Hagman, Alberto Gianini, and Juan C. Avalos and Defendants Golden State FC LLC (now known as Amazon.com Services, Inc.), Amazon.com Inc., and Amazon Fulfillment Services, Inc. (now known as Amazon.com Services, Inc.) (“Defendants”) (collectively, the “Parties”), by and through their respective undersigned counsel of record, that in order to facilitate the exchange of information and documents which may be subject to confidentiality limitations on disclosure due to federal laws, state laws, and privacy rights, the Parties respectfully request that the Court sign and enter the [Proposed] Order following this Stipulated Protective Order to govern the production of documents and the conduct of discovery in this action. 1. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS Disclosure and discovery activity in this action are likely to involve production of confidential, proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be warranted. Accordingly, the Parties hereby stipulate to and petition the court to enter the following Stipulated Protective Order. The Parties acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to discovery and that the protection it affords from public disclosure and use extends only to the limited information or items that are entitled to confidential treatment under the applicable legal principles. The Parties further acknowledge, as set forth in Section 12.3, below, that this Stipulated Protective Order does not entitle them to file confidential information under seal; Local Rule 141 sets forth the procedures that must be followed and the standards that will be applied when a party seeks permission from the court to file material under seal. 2. DEFINITIONS 2.1 Challenging Party: a Party or Non-Party that challenges the designation of information or items under this Order. generated, stored or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for protection under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c). 2.3 Counsel (without qualifier): Outside Counsel of Record and House Counsel (as well as their support staff). 2.4 Designating Party: a Party or Non-Party that designates information or items that it produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as “CONFIDENTIAL.” 2.5 Disclosure or Discovery Material: all items or information, regardless of the medium or manner in which it is generated, stored, or maintained (including, among other things, testimony, transcripts, and tangible things), that are produced or generated in disclosures or responses to discovery in this matter. 2.6 Expert: a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter pertinent to the litigation who has been retained by a Party or its counsel to serve as an expert witness or as a consultant in this action. 2.7 House Counsel: attorneys who are employees of a party to this action. House Counsel does not include Outside Counsel of Record or any other outside counsel. 2.8 Non-Party: any natural person, partnership, corporation, association, or other legal entity not named as a Party to this action. 2.9 Outside Counsel of Record: attorneys who are not employees of a party to this action but are retained to represent or advise a party to this action and have appeared in this action on behalf of that party or are affiliated with a law firm which has appeared on behalf of that party. 2.10 Party: any party to this action, including all of its officers, directors, employees, consultants, retained experts, and Outside Counsel of Record (and their support staffs). 2.11 Producing Party: a Party or Non-Party that produces Disclosure or Discovery Material in this action. 2.12 Professional Vendors: persons or entities that provide litigation support services (e.g., photocopying, videotaping, translating, preparing exhibits or demonstrations, and organizing, storing, or retrieving data in any form or medium) and their employees and subcontractors. “CONFIDENTIAL.” 2.14 Receiving Party: a Party that receives Disclosure or Discovery Material from a Producing Party. 3. SCOPE The protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order cover not only Protected Material (as defined above), but also (1) any information copied or extracted from Protected Material; (2) all copies, excerpts, summaries, or compilations of Protected Material; and (3) any testimony, conversations, or presentations by Parties or their Counsel that might reveal Protected Material. However, the protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order do not cover the following information: (a) any information that is in the public domain at the time of disclosure to a Receiving Party or becomes part of the public domain after its disclosure to a Receiving Party as a result of publication not involving a violati

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Trevino v. Golden State FC LLC, (E.D. Cal. 2019).

Trevino v. Golden State FC LLC (Trevino v. Golden State FC LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pintos v. PACIFIC CREDITORS ASS'N
605 F.3d 665 (Ninth Circuit, 2010)