Trevil v. State
992 So. 2d 346, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 15112, 2008 WL 4414214
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 1, 2008
DocketNo. 3D07-1405
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 992 So. 2d 346 (Trevil v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Trevil v. State, 992 So. 2d 346, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 15112, 2008 WL 4414214 (Fla. Ct. App. 2008).
Opinion
Because we find that appellant did not apprise the trial court of the potential discovery violation in a timely manner, we affirm. See Cuciak v. State, 410 So.2d 916, 918 (Fla.1982) (“The probationer has the burden of bringing the violation to the court’s attention in a timely manner.”).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Miller v. Miller
992 So. 2d 346 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
992 So. 2d 346, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 15112, 2008 WL 4414214, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/trevil-v-state-fladistctapp-2008.