Treutler v. Halligan

86 Ill. 39

• Court: Illinois Supreme Court
• Decided: September 15, 1877
• Status: Published

Opinion

Mr. Justice Scott

delivered the opinion of the Court:

Neither defendant nor his attorney appeared in the court below when this cause was called in its order for trial. As there was no appearance, the cause was submitted to a jury, who returned a verdict for plaintiff, upon which the court rendered judgment. At the same term defendant entered a motion to vacate the judgment and for leave to make defense to the action, but the motion was overruled.

Where there has been no abuse of that discretion with which circuit courts are clothed, the action of the court in disposing of such motions as the one made in this case will not be reviewed in this court. It is not shown there has been any abuse of a sound discretion. Affidavits filed show no reason why defendant could not have had his day in court had he been diligent. According to his own affidavit he gave the defense of the suit against, him no personal attention whatever. Had defendant been in court with his witnesses, if he had any, it is not probable there would have been any difficulty in securing a trial. The fact he had no opportunity to present his defense, whatever it was, is to be attributed to his own negligence or that of his attorney, against which courts will not relieve him.

The judgment will be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.