Treusdell v. O'Donnell

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Treusdell v. O'Donnell

1 Monag. 495, 1889 Pa. LEXIS 1262

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedFebruary 26, 1889

DocketNo. 186

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Monag. 495 (Treusdell v. O'Donnell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Treusdell v. O'Donnell, 1 Monag. 495, 1889 Pa. LEXIS 1262 (Pa. 1889).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam,

Judgment affirmed.

When this ease, and the case of Buch v. Long, supra, page 458, were heard in the supreme court, the case of Orr v. Bornstein, 23 W. N. C. 356, had just been decided, establishing the law as stated in the syllabus to the above case. This case cannot be relied upon, therefore, as a precedent for the point decided in the court below. The supreme court would not reverse, although the instruction might have been erroneous as applied to a married woman who had not taken the benefit of the Act of 1872.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

Judgment affirmed.

When this ease, and the case of Buch v. Long, supra, page 458, were heard in the supreme court, the case of Orr v. Bornstein, 23 W. N. C. 356, had just been decided, establishing the law as stated in the syllabus to the above case. This case cannot be relied upon, therefore, as a precedent for the point decided in the court below. The supreme court would not reverse, although the instruction might have been erroneous as applied to a married woman who had not taken the benefit of the Act of 1872.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Monag. 495, 1889 Pa. LEXIS 1262, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/treusdell-v-odonnell-pa-1889.