Tretten v. Irrgang

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Tretten v. Irrgang

654 So. 2d 1297, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 5756, 1995 WL 322647

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 31, 1995

DocketNo. 94-1345

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 654 So. 2d 1297 (Tretten v. Irrgang) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tretten v. Irrgang, 654 So. 2d 1297, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 5756, 1995 WL 322647 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The trial court entered summary judgment in favor of Paul Irrgang. Appellants’ contend that the order granting summary judgment was erroneous because the record reflects the existence of genuine issues of material fact. We agree.

According to Hervey v. Alfonso, 650 So.2d 644 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995):

[I]f a record reflects the existence of any genuine issue of material fact or the possibility of any issue, or if the record raises even the slightest doubt that an issue might exist, that doubt must be resolved against the moving party, and summary judgment must be denied.

Id. at 646. We find that the record before us reflects that there is a genuine question of fact regarding the foreseeability that Mr. Jaggan would burn trash in Mr. Irrgang’s absence, and we therefore find that the order granting summary judgment should be reversed.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

DELL, C.J., and POLEN and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI