Treto v. Post, Buckley, Schuh & Jernigan, Inc.
This text of 483 So. 2d 781 (Treto v. Post, Buckley, Schuh & Jernigan, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Finding that Count IX of the Third Amended Complaint states a cause of action, we reverse the order dismissing Count IX of the Third Amended Complaint with prejudice. Conklin v. Cohen, 287 So.2d 56 (Fla.1973); Pizzi v. Central Bank & Trust Co., 250 So.2d 895 (Fla.1971); Copeland v. Celotex Corp., 447 So.2d 908 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984), modified on other grounds, 471 So.2d 533 (Fla.1985).
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
483 So. 2d 781, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 6542, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/treto-v-post-buckley-schuh-jernigan-inc-fladistctapp-1986.