Treto v. Post, Buckley, Schuh & Jernigan, Inc.

483 So. 2d 781, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 6542
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 11, 1986·No. No. 85-1452·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Finding that Count IX of the Third Amended Complaint states a cause of action, we reverse the order dismissing Count IX of the Third Amended Complaint with prejudice. Conklin v. Cohen, 287 So.2d 56 (Fla.1973); Pizzi v. Central Bank & Trust Co., 250 So.2d 895 (Fla.1971); Copeland v. Celotex Corp., 447 So.2d 908 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984), modified on other grounds, 471 So.2d 533 (Fla.1985).

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Treto v. Post, Buckley, Schuh & Jernigan, Inc., 483 So. 2d 781, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 6542 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

483 So. 2d 781 (Treto v. Post, Buckley, Schuh & Jernigan, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pizzi v. Central Bank and Trust Company
250 So. 2d 895 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1971)
Conklin v. Cohen
287 So. 2d 56 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1973)
Copeland v. Celotex Corp.
447 So. 2d 908 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)
Celotex Corp. v. Copeland
471 So. 2d 533 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1985)