Treston v. Allegretta

166 A.D.2d 282, 564 N.Y.S.2d 113, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11911
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 16, 1990
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 166 A.D.2d 282 (Treston v. Allegretta) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Treston v. Allegretta, 166 A.D.2d 282, 564 N.Y.S.2d 113, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11911 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Ethel Danzig, J.), entered May 19, 1989, denying second third-party defendant Champion Pools Incorporated’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint of second third-party plaintiff Jet-Line Products of L. L, Inc., unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff commenced an action against numerous defendants, including second third-party plaintiff Jet-Line Products of L. I. (JLP), a wholesale distributor of swimming pools and equipment, to recover damages for personal injuries allegedly sustained on September 3, 1979, when she allegedly dove into [283]*283a swimming pool at the Allegretta Motel in Hampton Bays, New York, at 5:00 a.m. JLP commenced its second third-party action against Champion Pools Incorporated (Champion), a supplier of components for the subject swimming pool, and thereafter Champion moved for summary judgment to dismiss JLP’s complaint on the ground it had not designed, manufactured, nor installed the pool’s vinyl liner, to which plaintiff referred in her pleadings as being defective and a possible cause of the accident.

Our review of the record reveals that Champion’s motion for summary judgment was properly denied as it failed to establish its defense sufficiently to warrant the court to direct judgment in its favor. (See, Gilbert Frank Corp. v Federal Ins. Co., 70 NY2d 966, 967.) Material issues of fact exist concerning whether the vinyl liner, alone, was the proximate cause of the accident, or whether some design or manufacturing flaw in the pool, some of whose components were supplied by Champion, contributed to the event. Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Ross, Carro, Asch and Ellerin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Treston v. Allegretta
180 A.D.2d 616 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
166 A.D.2d 282, 564 N.Y.S.2d 113, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11911, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/treston-v-allegretta-nyappdiv-1990.