Tressler v. Kelly

116 So. 2d 782
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 4, 1960
DocketNo. 59-658
StatusPublished

This text of 116 So. 2d 782 (Tressler v. Kelly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tressler v. Kelly, 116 So. 2d 782 (Fla. Ct. App. 1960).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Relator in a habeas corpus proceeding in the circuit court appeals from an order quashing the writ and remanding relator to respondent’s custody. She urges that it affirmatively appears that the trial judge erred when he found the proof evident or the presumption great that the relator was guilty of murder in the first degree. See Deeb v. Gandy, 110 Fla. 283, 148 So. 540. A review of the record in the light of the briefs and argument does not disclose such error. See Culpepper v. Osteen, 153 Fla. 161, 13 So.2d 911.

Affirmed.

PEARSON, Acting C. J., CARROLL, CHAS., J., and BARNS, PAUL D., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Deeb v. Gandy
148 So. 540 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1933)
Culpepper v. Osteen
13 So. 2d 911 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1943)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
116 So. 2d 782, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tressler-v-kelly-fladistctapp-1960.