Trepuk v. Frank

New York Court of Appeals

Trepuk v. Frank

437 N.E.2d 278, 56 N.Y.2d 779, 452 N.Y.S.2d 19, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3417

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 18, 1982

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 437 N.E.2d 278 (Trepuk v. Frank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Trepuk v. Frank, 437 N.E.2d 278, 56 N.Y.2d 779, 452 N.Y.S.2d 19, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3417 (N.Y. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [b]), order reversed, with costs, and defendant’s motion for summary judgment denied for the reasons stated in the dissenting memorandum of Justice Harold Birns at the Appellate Division (86 AD2d 578, 579).

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [b]), order reversed, with costs, and defendant’s motion for summary judgment denied for the reasons stated in the dissenting memorandum of Justice Harold Birns at the Appellate Division (86 AD2d 578, 579).

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

437 N.E.2d 278, 56 N.Y.2d 779, 452 N.Y.S.2d 19, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3417, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/trepuk-v-frank-ny-1982.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack