Trepuk v. Frank

437 N.E.2d 278, 56 N.Y.2d 779, 452 N.Y.S.2d 19, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3417
New York Court of Appeals·Decided May 18, 1982·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [b]), order reversed, with costs, and defendant’s motion for summary judgment denied for the reasons stated in the dissenting memorandum of Justice Harold Birns at the Appellate Division (86 AD2d 578, 579).

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Trepuk v. Frank, 437 N.E.2d 278, 56 N.Y.2d 779, 452 N.Y.S.2d 19, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3417 (N.Y. 1982).

437 N.E.2d 278 (Trepuk v. Frank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gurbanova v. City of Ithaca
2025 NY Slip Op 00252 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2025)
Trepuk v. Frank
104 A.D.2d 780 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)