Treptow v. Treptow Realty Co.
This text of 251 A.D. 727 (Treptow v. Treptow Realty Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
On appeal from order denying motion to dismiss the complaint in an action seeking to restrain the alienation of property by a husband as in fraudulent violation of an ante-nuptial agreement, and to restore property already conveyed, order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to answer within ten days from the entry of the order hereon. No opinion. Hagarty, Davis, Johnston and Taylor, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., not voting.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
251 A.D. 727, 297 N.Y.S. 447, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7253, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/treptow-v-treptow-realty-co-nyappdiv-1937.