Trenton Passenger Railway Co. v. Bennett

34 A. 815, 58 N.J.L. 556, 29 Vroom 556, 1896 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 130
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedFebruary 15, 1896
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 34 A. 815 (Trenton Passenger Railway Co. v. Bennett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Trenton Passenger Railway Co. v. Bennett, 34 A. 815, 58 N.J.L. 556, 29 Vroom 556, 1896 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 130 (N.J. 1896).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The' controversy in these cases is one that must be passed upon by a jury.- The questions were clearly presented by the trial court in his charge, and the conduct of the jury was not such as to indicate unfitness or unfairness. We see no reason for taking the opinion of a second jury on the disputed questions. If the contention of the defendants be correct, viz., that there was no case for a jury, that may with propriety be set up on proceedings in error.

The applications for a new trial are denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kursheedt v. Standard Bleachery Co.
76 A. 322 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1910)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
34 A. 815, 58 N.J.L. 556, 29 Vroom 556, 1896 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 130, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/trenton-passenger-railway-co-v-bennett-nj-1896.