Trenton & Mercer County Traction Corp. v. City of Trenton

119 A. 31, 98 N.J.L. 297, 13 Gummere 297, 1922 N.J. LEXIS 304
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided November 20, 1922·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

A question presents itself upon this record as to- the status of the prosecutor to initiate and conduct this proceeding, but the question was not raised or argued in the Supreme Court or here, and, therefore, we express no opinion upon it. See Levy v. Elizabeth, 81 N. J. L. 643, and cases cited.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed,-'for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Mintum in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Swayze, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Gardner, Ackerson, Van Buskirk, JJ. 9.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Trenton & Mercer County Traction Corp. v. City of Trenton, 119 A. 31, 98 N.J.L. 297, 13 Gummere 297, 1922 N.J. LEXIS 304 (N.J. 1922).

119 A. 31 (Trenton & Mercer County Traction Corp. v. City of Trenton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Harvey v. Poole
7 A.2d 630 (Monmouth County Superior Court, 1939)