Trent Davis v. Texas Department of Family and Protective Services
This text of Trent Davis v. Texas Department of Family and Protective Services (Trent Davis v. Texas Department of Family and Protective Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-10-00624-CV
Trent Davis, Appellant
v.
Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Appellee
FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 126TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
NO. D-1-GN-08-001528, HONORABLE LORA J. LIVINGSTON, JUDGE PRESIDING
M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
Appellant Trent Davis, appearing pro se, seeks to appeal from the trial court’s order granting his trial counsel’s agreed motion to withdraw. This Court’s jurisdiction is limited to the review of final judgments and certain interlocutory orders signed by the trial court. See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 51.012 (West Supp. 2010), § 51.014 (West 2008); see also Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001). A trial court’s order granting a motion to withdraw is not an appealable interlocutory order. See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 51.014. No appealable judgment or order appears in the record. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
Diane M. Henson, Justice
Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Patterson and Henson
Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction
Filed: November 5, 2010
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Trent Davis v. Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/trent-davis-v-texas-department-of-family-and-prote-texapp-2010.