Tremblay v. Board of Education of Westbury Union Free School District

75 A.D.2d 621, 427 N.Y.S.2d 51, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11084
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 21, 1980
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 75 A.D.2d 621 (Tremblay v. Board of Education of Westbury Union Free School District) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tremblay v. Board of Education of Westbury Union Free School District, 75 A.D.2d 621, 427 N.Y.S.2d 51, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11084 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1980).

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to compel respondent, inter alia, to reinstate petitioner to the position of teacher, nunc pro tunc, with back pay, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated June 4, 1979, which dismissed the petition. Judgment, affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. Petitioner, a tenured elementary school teacher, was excessed from her position on June 30, 1978 and put on the preferred list. On September 11, 1978 petitioner resumed work as a substitute until September 20, 1978, when she was reinstated as a regular teacher. Respondent has since retroactively restored to petitioner her permanent salary, seniority and other accrued emoluments for the period petitioner served as a substitute. Petitioner, however, claims she is entitled to back pay and accrued seniority from September 1, 1978, the time the position allegedly became vacant, to September 11, 1978. During this period, the class to which petitioner was eventually assigned was covered by the rescheduling of existing personnel. Subdivision 3 of section 2510 of the Education Law does not require recall to a vacancy as soon as it occurs. While the board of a union free school district may not make a temporary appointment to fill a permanent vacancy (see Serritella v Board of Educ., 58 AD2d 645, mot for lv to app den 43 NY2d 642), it does have the power, under subdivision 16 of section 1709 of the Education Law, to determine when a vacancy exists (see Matter of Halladay, 69 St Dept Rep 5). Hopkins, J. P., Lazer, Gibbons and Weinstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

DiPiazza v. Board of Education
214 A.D.2d 729 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
Lynch v. Board of Education
81 A.D.2d 668 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
75 A.D.2d 621, 427 N.Y.S.2d 51, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11084, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tremblay-v-board-of-education-of-westbury-union-free-school-district-nyappdiv-1980.