Tremaine v. Tremaine
645 A.2d 1020, 231 Conn. 901, 1994 Conn. LEXIS 296
This text of 645 A.2d 1020 (Tremaine v. Tremaine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Tremaine v. Tremaine, 645 A.2d 1020, 231 Conn. 901, 1994 Conn. LEXIS 296 (Colo. 1994).
Opinion
The plaintiff’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 34 Conn. App. 785 (AC 11164), is granted, limited to the following issues:
“1. Did the Appellate Court misconstrue the initial presentation of the separation agreement as an [902]*902‘approved agreement’ with respect to the award of alimony where the initial agreement reserved the determination of alimony for a date in the future?
“2. Did the Appellate Court correctly conclude that in a separation agreement that reserves the issue of ‘alimony’ for determination at a later date, that the term ‘alimony’ was limited to periodic alimony and did not include lump sum alimony?”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Tremaine v. Tremaine
663 A.2d 387 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1995)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
645 A.2d 1020, 231 Conn. 901, 1994 Conn. LEXIS 296, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tremaine-v-tremaine-conn-1994.