Tremaine v. Haines

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Tremaine v. Haines

239 A.D. 876

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 15, 1933·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The theory upon which the complaint was framed, the case tried" and" the matter submitted' to the jury was one of employment of the plaintiff [877]*877by the defendant. The finding of the jury for the plaintiff on this theory was contrary to and against the weight of the evidence. All concur. Judgment and order reversed on the law and facts, with costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The theory upon which the complaint was framed, the case tried" and" the matter submitted' to the jury was one of employment of the plaintiff [877]*877by the defendant. The finding of the jury for the plaintiff on this theory was contrary to and against the weight of the evidence. All concur. Judgment and order reversed on the law and facts, with costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs.

Tremaine v. Haines, 239 A.D. 876 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).

Pincite

239 A.D. 876 (Tremaine v. Haines) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related