Tremaine Johnson v. State of Florida
This text of Tremaine Johnson v. State of Florida (Tremaine Johnson v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________
No. 1D21-102 _____________________________
TREMAINE JOHNSON,
Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee. _____________________________
On appeal from the Circuit Court for Alachua County. Mark W. Moseley, Judge.
September 22, 2021
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the postconviction court’s order denying Appellant’s rule 3.850 motion. Appellant’s claim is barred by the law of the case doctrine as it was previously raised and denied on direct appeal. See Moore v. State, 768 So. 2d 1140 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000). The Court warns Appellant that any future filings that this Court determines to be frivolous may result in the imposition of sanctions, including a prohibition against any further pro se filings in this Court and a referral to the appropriate institution for disciplinary procedures. See § 944.279, Fla. Stat. (2021).
B.L. THOMAS, WINOKUR, and JAY, JJ., concur. _____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________
Tremaine Johnson, pro se, Appellant.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Tremaine Johnson v. State of Florida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tremaine-johnson-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2021.