Trejo v. Golembe

86 So. 3d 1239, 2012 WL 1521698, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 6823
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 2, 2012
DocketNo. 3D11-903
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 86 So. 3d 1239 (Trejo v. Golembe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Trejo v. Golembe, 86 So. 3d 1239, 2012 WL 1521698, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 6823 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Steele v. Kehoe, 747 So.2d 931 (Fla.1999); see also Georganas-Kesselman v. Sheppard, No. 4:01cv98-RH, 2002 WL 34519639 (N.D.Fla. Mar.27, 2002).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Carlos Rafael Saez Dorta v. Robert M. Perez
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2025

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
86 So. 3d 1239, 2012 WL 1521698, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 6823, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/trejo-v-golembe-fladistctapp-2012.