Trejo v. California Forensic Medical Group

District Court, S.D. California·Decided September 12, 2024·No. 3:20-cv-01465·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOSE TREJO, et al., Case No.: 20-cv-1465-DDL Plaintiffs, FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE v. ORDER CALIFORNIA FORENSIC MEDICAL GROUP, Defendant. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(e), Local Civil Rule 16.1(f) and the Court’s Amended Scheduling Order (Dkt. No. 185), IT IS ORDERED: I. From October 27, 2018 to February 23, 2019, Jose Banda Pichardo was an inmate incarcerated at the Imperial County Sheriff’s Department, Regional Adult Detention Facility. During this time, Defendant California Forensic Medical Group was responsible for administering medical and mental health care to inmates incarcerated at the Imperial County Sheriff’s Department, Regional Adult Detention Facility. On February 23, 2019, Jose Banda Pichardo died by suicide in his cell by asphyxiating himself with a bedsheet. The parties in this case are Plaintiff Estate of Jose Banda Pichardo, Plaintiff Jose Trejo, who is the father of decedent Jose Banda Pichardo, Plaintiff Susana Banda, who is the mother of decedent Jose Banda Pichardo, and Defendant California Forensic Medical Group (hereinafter also “CFMG”). II. The pleadings that raise the issues are Plaintiff’s Fourth Amended Complaint, filed on January 30, 2024 (Dkt. No. 175); and Defendant’s Answer, filed March 1, 2024 (Dkt. No. 176). The causes of action against Defendant CFMG are the third cause of action, which is a survival cause of action for negligence brought on behalf of Plaintiff Estate of Jose Banda Pichardo, and the fifth cause of action, which is a wrongful death cause of action brought on behalf of Plaintiffs Jose Trejo and Susana Banda pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure § 377.60. A. Expect to Call 1. Plaintiffs 1. Plaintiff Jose Trejo: Plaintiff in this case who will testify as to damages. 2. Plaintiff Susana Banda: Plaintiff in this case who will testify as to damages. 3. Michael Jay Dibble: Independent witness who will testify as to events perceived relative to underlying incident. 4. Joshua Lee Greene: Independent witness who will testify as to events perceived relative to underlying incident. 5. Dagoberto Conde: Independent witness who will testify as to events perceived relative to underlying incident. 6. Plaintiffs’ Forensic Psychiatrist Expert Nicole Johnson, M.D.: Plaintiff’s retained expert witness relative to psychiatry. 7. Plaintiffs’ Corrections Expert Tim Gravette: Plaintiff’s retained expert witness relative to correctional practices. 8. Imperial County Sheriff’s Office Deputy Chief Jamie Clayton (Ret.): County employee who will testify as to underlying incident and provide testimony relative to the jail. 9. Imperial County Sheriff’s Office Watch Commander Colby Stewart: County employee who will testify as to underlying incident and provide testimony relative to the jail. 10. Imperial County Sheriff’s Office Correctional Officer Arthur Aguilar: County employee who will testify as to underlying incident and provide testimony relative to the jail. 11. Imperial County Sheriff’s Office Correctional Officer Dominic Aguirre: County employee who will testify as to underlying incident and provide testimony relative to the jail. 12. Imperial County Sheriff’s Office County FRCP 30(b)(6) Person Most Knowledgeable Juan Chavarin: County employee who will testify as to underlying incident and provide testimony relative to the jail. 13. CFMG Health Services Administrator and FRCP 30(b)(6) Person Most Knowledgeable Linda Corfman, R.N.: CFMG employee who will testify about CFMG’s role at the jail as well as services administered by CFMG. This witness will also testify concerning the underlying incident. 14. CFMG Psychiatrist Taylor Fithian, M.D.: CFMG employee who will testify about CFMG’s role at the jail as well as services administered by CFMG. 15. CFMG Nurse Dorina Armenta, R.N.: CFMG employee who will testify about CFMG’s role at the jail as well as services administered by CFMG. This witness will also testify concerning the underlying incident. 16. CFMG Nurse Norma Franco, L.V.N.: CFMG employee who will testify about CFMG’s role at the jail as well as services administered by CFMG. This witness will also testify concerning the underlying incident. 17. CFMG Miguel Duarte, R.N.: CFMG employee who will testify about CFMG’s role at the jail as well as services administered by CFMG. This witness will also testify concerning the underlying incident. 18. CFMG Independent Contracting Tele Psychiatrist Michael Salib, M.D.: CFMG employee who will testify about CFMG’s role at the jail as well as services administered by CFMG. This witness will also testify concerning the underlying incident. 19. Imperial County Sheriff’s Office Investigator Marco Lopez: County employee who will testify as to the investigation of the death. 20. Imperial County Coroner’s Office Forensic Pathologist Darryl J. Garber, M.D.: County employee who will testify as to the autopsy of Mr. Pichardo. 21. CFMG Richard Shunnarah, R.N: CFMG employee who will testify about CFMG’s role at the jail as well as services administered by CFMG. 22. Board of State and Community Corrections Custodian of Records: Custodian of records to authenticate Board of State and Community Corrections records. 2. Defendant Defendant expects to call the above witnesses at numbers 1-2 and 8-21. In addition, defendant expects to call: 1. Kim Pearson, R.N.: Defendant’s retained expert witness on the standard of care, policies and causation. 2. Robert Fonzi: Imperial County’s retained expert witness relative to correctional practices. 3. Vanessa Alvarado: CFMG employee and percipient witness regarding decedent’s care and treatment at the Imperial County Jail. 4. Antenela Barron, LVN: CFMG employee and percipient witness regarding decedent’s care and treatment at the Imperial County Jail. 5. Jaime Daleth, L.V.N.: CFMG employee and percipient witness regarding decedent’s care and treatment at the Imperial County Jail. / / / 6. Ivan Martin: CFMG employee and percipient witness regarding decedent’s care and treatment at the Imperial County Jail. 7. Julio Martinez, M.D.: CFMG contractor and Percipient witness regarding decedent’s care and treatment at the Imperial County Jail and CFMG’s medical and mental health program at Imperial County Jail during the relevant time frame. B. Reserve the Right to Call 1. Plaintiffs Plaintiffs intend to call all aforementioned witnesses at trial. 2. Defendant Defendant intends to call all aforementioned witnesses at trial. Defendant reserves the right to call impeachment witnesses as necessary. IV. A. Expect to Offer 1. Plaintiffs 1. Imperial County Sheriff’s Office (hereinafter “ICSO”) Watch Commander Colby Stewart Standard Diary/Daily Logs (IMP001231-1351) 2. ICSO Jail Logs re: Jose Banda Pichardo (IMP000117-118) 3. ICSO Jail Events/Summary Reports re: Jose Banda Pichardo (IMP000034- 52) 4. CFMG Medical Records re: Jose Banda Pichardo (CFMG-JBP 000001-89) 5. ICSO Guard 1-Plus Round Tracker Module H (IMP000080-82) 6. ICSO Incident Report re: Jose Banda Pichardo Suicide (IMP000010-33) 7. Board of State and Community Corrections (IMP001352-1488) 8. ICSO Command Staff Email Authored by Inv. Lopez (IMP001112) 9. ICSO Inv. Lopez’s Investigative Report Memorializing Inmate Witness Interviews (IMP001497-1500) 10. ICSO Crime Investigation Unit - Photographs of Cell (IMP000102-105) 11. ICSO Body Cam of Inmate Interviews__ 30-AXON_Body_2_Video_2019- 02-23_0856 (IMP000371) 12. Certified Transcription of “ICSO Body Cam of Inmate Interviews__ 30- AXON_Body_2_Video_2019-02-23_0856 (IMP000371)” 13. ICSO Body Cam of Inmate Dagoberto Conde Interview__29- AXON_Body_2_Video_2019-02-23_1046 (IMP0003

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Trejo v. California Forensic Medical Group, (S.D. Cal. 2024).

Trejo v. California Forensic Medical Group (Trejo v. California Forensic Medical Group) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Estate of Manuel Diaz v. City of Anaheim
840 F.3d 592 (Ninth Circuit, 2016)