Trejo (Mario) v. State
This text of Trejo (Mario) v. State (Trejo (Mario) v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
MARIO BLADIMIR TREJO, No. 84188 Appellant, vs. THE STATE OF NEVADA, FIL Respondent. FEB 2 it 2022 ELIZAti .11A. ei CLE lOF LIPREMZ COURT
CLERK
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
This is a pro se appeal from a district court order denying a
pretrial "motion to dismiss case/prosecutorial misconduct and perjury." Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Erika D. Ballou, Judge. Because no statute or court rule provides for an appeal from an
order denying a pretrial "motion to dismiss case/prosecutorial misconduct and perjury", this court lacks jurisdiction to consider this appeal. NRS 177.015(1)(h) (stating that State or defendant may appeal from an order granting a motion to dismiss); Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 352, 792 P.2d 1133, 1135 (1990). Accordingly, this court
ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.
Silver
Ae,64. , J. Pickering 197 SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
01 1947A 2„:1- 601 3 cc: Hon. Erika D. Ballou, District Judge Mario Bladirnir Trejo Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
OA I 947A 4740:17, 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Trejo (Mario) v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/trejo-mario-v-state-nev-2022.