Trejo (Mario) v. State

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

MARIO BLADIMIR TREJO, No. 84188 Appellant,

vs.

THE STATE OF NEVADA, FIL Respondent.

FEB 2 it 2022 ELIZAti .11A. ei CLE lOF LIPREMZ COURT

CLERK

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This is a pro se appeal from a district court order denying a

pretrial "motion to dismiss case/prosecutorial misconduct and perjury." Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Erika D. Ballou, Judge.

Because no statute or court rule provides for an appeal from an

order denying a pretrial "motion to dismiss case/prosecutorial misconduct and perjury", this court lacks jurisdiction to consider this appeal. NRS 177.015(1)(h) (stating that State or defendant may appeal from an order granting a motion to dismiss); Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 352, 792 P.2d 1133, 1135 (1990). Accordingly, this court

ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.

Silver

Ae,64. , J.

Pickering

197

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

01 1947A 2„:1- 601 3

2

cc: Hon. Erika D. Ballou, District Judge Mario Bladirnir Trejo Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

OA I 947A 4740:17,