Treister v. Broome

114 So. 2d 706
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 28, 1959·No. No. 59-255·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See § 745.15, Fla.Stat, F.S.A.; Harkins v. Holt, 124 Fla. 774, 169 So. 481; Oates v. New York Life Ins. Co., 113 Fla. 678, 152 So. 671; Menendez v. Rodriguez, 106 Fla. 214, 143 So. 223.

HORTON, C. J., CARROLL, CHAS., J., and LOPEZ, AQUILINO, Jr., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Treister v. Broome, 114 So. 2d 706 (Fla. Ct. App. 1959).

114 So. 2d 706 (Treister v. Broome) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Menendez v. Rodriguez
143 So. 223 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1932)
Oates, Et Ux. v. New York Life Insurance Co.
152 So. 671 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1934)
Harkins v. Holt
169 So. 481 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1936)