Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Treister v. Broome

Treister v. Broome

114 So. 2d 706
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 28, 1959
DocketNo. 59-255
StatusPublished

This text of 114 So. 2d 706 (Treister v. Broome) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Treister v. Broome, 114 So. 2d 706 (Fla. Ct. App. 1959).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See § 745.15, Fla.Stat, F.S.A.; Harkins v. Holt, 124 Fla. 774, 169 So. 481; Oates v. New York Life Ins. Co., 113 Fla. 678, 152 So. 671; Menendez v. Rodriguez, 106 Fla. 214, 143 So. 223.

HORTON, C. J., CARROLL, CHAS., J., and LOPEZ, AQUILINO, Jr., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Menendez v. Rodriguez
143 So. 223 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1932)
Oates, Et Ux. v. New York Life Insurance Co.
152 So. 671 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1934)
Harkins v. Holt
169 So. 481 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1936)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
114 So. 2d 706, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/treister-v-broome-fladistctapp-1959.