Treib & Brodsky, Inc. v. North
This text of 170 A.D. 955 (Treib & Brodsky, Inc. v. North) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Controversy determined in favor of plaintiff and against defendant, and judgment directed accordingly, without costs, upon the ground that under authority of De Peyster v. Murphy (66 N. Y. 622); Lathers v. Keogh (109 id. 583), and Doonan v. Killilea (87 Misc. Rep. 427), affirmed simultaneously [956]*956herewith it must be held that the assessment installments due after the closing day were nevertheless upon that day an incumbrance within the meaning of the contract. Jenks, P. J., Mills, Rich and Putnam, JJ., concurred; Thomas, J., not voting.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
170 A.D. 955, 155 N.Y.S. 1144, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/treib-brodsky-inc-v-north-nyappdiv-1915.