Trehy v. Commack Union Free School District
This text of 93 A.D.2d 891 (Trehy v. Commack Union Free School District) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to, inter alia, expunge the school record of the infant son of the petitioner of any reference to a five-day suspension, the appeal (by permission) is from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (D’Amaro, J.), dated May 10, 1982, which denied the appellants’ motion to dismiss the petition for failure to comply with subdivision 1 of section 3813 of the Education Law. Order affirmed, without costs or disbursements. Since petitioner has sought primarily equitable relief in this proceeding, compliance with the notice of claim provisions contained in subdivision 1 of section 3813 of the Education Law was not necessary (see Ruocco v Doyle, 38 AD2d 132). Accordingly, the denial of appellants’ motion to dismiss was proper. Lazer, J. P., Mangano, Gulotta and Bracken, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
93 A.D.2d 891, 461 N.Y.S.2d 402, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17776, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/trehy-v-commack-union-free-school-district-nyappdiv-1983.