Trego v. Pennsylvania Academy of the Fine Arts
3 A. 819, 2 Sadler 313, 18 Week. No. 98, 1886 Pa. LEXIS 599
Opinion
The manifest meaning of the proposal is that prizes would be given in pursuance of awards, and not contrary thereto.
The persons who shall compose the jury of awards are stated in the offer. They were to constitute the tribunal to pass upon the merits of the paintings, and to decide to which prizes should be awarded. Unless so awarded by this jury no prize was demandable. There was, therefore, no error in entering judgment for the defendant on the demurrer.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Trego v. Pennsylvania Academy of the Fine Arts, 3 A. 819, 2 Sadler 313, 18 Week. No. 98, 1886 Pa. LEXIS 599 (Pa. 1886).
3 A. 819 (Trego v. Pennsylvania Academy of the Fine Arts) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
PERSONAVERA, LLC v. COLLEGE OF HEALTHCARE INFORMATION MANAGEMENT EXECUTIVES
E.D. Pennsylvania, 2021
Cobaugh v. Klick-Lewis, Inc.
561 A.2d 1248 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1989)
Olschiefsky v. Times Publishing Co.
23 Pa. D. & C.2d 73 (Erie County Court Common Pleas, 1959)
Southwestern Land Co. v. McCallam
1914 OK 699 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1913)