Treff v. Treff

7 A.D.2d 842, 181 N.Y.S.2d 673, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10155
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 27, 1959
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 7 A.D.2d 842 (Treff v. Treff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Treff v. Treff, 7 A.D.2d 842, 181 N.Y.S.2d 673, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10155 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1959).

Opinion

On the defendant-appellant’s application to enlarge his right of visitation of the child as provided by the judgment in the separation action entered in 1954, the primary concern of the court is the interest and welfare of the child. We consider that the mutual recriminations of the parties which tend to keep uppermost their own matrimonial controversy and to submerge the child’s interest, preclude adequate consideration of this basic problem on affidavits. A careful examination of the facts concerning the present needs and requirements of the child and the present problem of providing for his welfare within the best available possibilities, ought to be made by the court itself with the parties personally before it. The child, a boy, is now 6 years old; and one of the problems is whether his normal growth and development would be promoted by enlarged contact with his father. On this question the father’s present attitude toward the child; his present disposition to help him as well as the actual record of his failure to contribute financially toward the child’s support have a relevance to the question of the child’s welfare. The mother’s actual course of management of the child while in her sole custody has equal relevance. Whether the fresh inquiry results in a decision to continue the present arrangement for custody and visitation, or a decision to alter it, the court should have the benefit of a full examination of the facts in reaching a well-advised conclusion. Order unanimously reversed on the law and on the facts, without costs, and the motion remitted to Special Term for a hearing, in accordance with the above memorandum opinion. Concur — Botein, P. J., M. M. Frank, Valente, McNally and Bergan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fischbein v. Fischbein
55 A.D.2d 885 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1977)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
7 A.D.2d 842, 181 N.Y.S.2d 673, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10155, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/treff-v-treff-nyappdiv-1959.