Home/Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma/Treese v. State

Treese v. State

1919 OK CR 198, 180 P. 190, 16 Okla. Crim. 682, 1919 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 129
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
DecidedJune 17, 1919
DocketNo. A-3037.
StatusPublished

This text of 1919 OK CR 198 (Treese v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Treese v. State, 1919 OK CR 198, 180 P. 190, 16 Okla. Crim. 682, 1919 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 129 (Okla. Ct. App. 1919).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error, A. L. Treese, was convicted of a violation of section 4,. c. 26, Session Laws 1913. From the judgment rendered on the verdict an appeal was duly perfected toy filing in this court on September 4, 1918, a petition in error with case-made.

In the case of Proctor v. State, 15 Okla. Cr. 338, 176 Pac. 771, the. statute upon which the prosecution in this case was based was held unconstitutional and void. For the reasons stated in the opinion in the Proctor Case, the judgment herein is reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Proctor v. State
1918 OK CR 190 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1918)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1919 OK CR 198, 180 P. 190, 16 Okla. Crim. 682, 1919 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 129, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/treese-v-state-oklacrimapp-1919.