Tredway v. Rickard

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Tredway v. Rickard

66 N.W. 974, 64 Minn. 280, 1896 Minn. LEXIS 117

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedApril 27, 1896

DocketNos. 10072-(317)

StatusPublished

This text of 66 N.W. 974 (Tredway v. Rickard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tredway v. Rickard, 66 N.W. 974, 64 Minn. 280, 1896 Minn. LEXIS 117 (Mich. 1896).

Pincite

Opinion

MITCHELL, J.

The only question in this case is whether the evidence justified the verdict of the jury to the effect that the note in suit was usurious. On this point there was a sharp conflict between the testimony of the plaintiff and that of the principal defendant, Rickard; and, as the jury were at liberty to accept the latter as true, we cannot disturb their verdict, approved, as it has been, by the trial judge, in refusing to grant a new trial.

Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MITCHELL, J.

The only question in this case is whether the evidence justified the verdict of the jury to the effect that the note in suit was usurious. On this point there was a sharp conflict between the testimony of the plaintiff and that of the principal defendant, Rickard; and, as the jury were at liberty to accept the latter as true, we cannot disturb their verdict, approved, as it has been, by the trial judge, in refusing to grant a new trial.

Order affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

66 N.W. 974, 64 Minn. 280, 1896 Minn. LEXIS 117, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tredway-v-rickard-minn-1896.