Tredick v. Wendell

1 N.H. 80
Superior Court of New Hampshire·Decided September 15, 1817·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per miriam.

The general rule undoubtedly is, that when a demand is made of the maker, the note itself should bé presented, in order that it may be delivered to him upon its being paid; but we think the facts in this case shew a sufficient compliance on the part of the plaintiff with the spirit of the rule. The note was in a bank within a few rods of the maker’s house, and he was informed where the note was, and requested to pay it. This was, in our .opinion, giving him a sufficient opportunity to pay the note and take it up, had he been disposed to do it.

Judgment on the verdict.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tredick v. Wendell, 1 N.H. 80 (N.H. Super. Ct. 1817).

1 N.H. 80 (Tredick v. Wendell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Moore v. Waitt
13 N.H. 415 (Superior Court of New Hampshire, 1843)
Maine Bank v. Smith
18 Me. 99 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1841)
Morse v. Bellows
7 N.H. 549 (Superior Court of New Hampshire, 1835)