Treat v. Stuart
5 Cal. 113
Opinion
Heydenfeldt, J., concurred.
The plaintiff in an action of forcible entry and unlawful detainer, must show an actual peaceable possession in himself at the time of the entry. A landlord cannot sue in this form in his own name for an unlawful entry upon the possession of his tenant.
The remedy is a summary one given by statute to protect the possession and cannot be extended by implication to any others than the real occupants.
The refusal of the Court below so to instruct the jury was error.
Judgment reversed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Treat v. Stuart, 5 Cal. 113 (Cal. 1855).
5 Cal. 113 (Treat v. Stuart) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Chezum v. Campbell
85 P. 48 (Washington Supreme Court, 1906)
Castro v. Tewksbury
11 P. 339 (California Supreme Court, 1886)
Hoag v. Pierce
28 Cal. 187 (California Supreme Court, 1865)