Treat v. Sacks

Ohio Supreme Court

Treat v. Sacks

172 Ohio St. (N.S.) 246

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedMay 10, 1961

DocketNo. 36636

StatusPublished

This text of 172 Ohio St. (N.S.) 246 (Treat v. Sacks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Treat v. Sacks, 172 Ohio St. (N.S.) 246 (Ohio 1961).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

There is no showing or claim that petitioner made application to be discharged or brought to trial between the time of his indictment and trial. To entitle an accused to a discharge on the ground that he was not brought to trial during the time limited by statute, he must make application to the court therefor. State v. Cunningham, 171 Ohio St., 54.

Petitioner remanded to custody.

Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Taet, Matthias, Bell, Radcliee and O’Neill, JJ., concur. Radcliee, J., of the Fourth Appellate District, sitting by designation in the place and stead of Herbert, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

There is no showing or claim that petitioner made application to be discharged or brought to trial between the time of his indictment and trial. To entitle an accused to a discharge on the ground that he was not brought to trial during the time limited by statute, he must make application to the court therefor. State v. Cunningham, 171 Ohio St., 54.

Petitioner remanded to custody.

Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Taet, Matthias, Bell, Radcliee and O’Neill, JJ., concur. Radcliee, J., of the Fourth Appellate District, sitting by designation in the place and stead of Herbert, J.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

172 Ohio St. (N.S.) 246, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/treat-v-sacks-ohio-1961.