Treat v. McMahon
2 Me. 120
Opinion
In a writ of entry on the seisin of the demandants and a disseisin by the tenant, Pond moved for leave to amend the writ, by striking out the name of one of the deoiandants which had been improperly inserted.
But thk Court, absenta Preble J. ruled that the amendment was inadmissible. Whereupon the demandants had leave to discontinue.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Treat v. McMahon, 2 Me. 120 (Me. 1822).
2 Me. 120 (Treat v. McMahon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.