Treat v. Laforge
15 Cal. 41
Opinion
Baldwin, J. and Field, C. J. concurring.
The judgment in this case must be construed by the verdict, which is confined to the plaintiff and the defendant, Laforge. We see no error in the record.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Treat v. Laforge, 15 Cal. 41 (Cal. 1860).
15 Cal. 41 (Treat v. Laforge) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
George v. Bekins Van & Storage Co.
189 P.2d 301 (California Court of Appeal, 1948)
Anderson v. State of Arizona
96 P.2d 281 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1939)
Prescott v. O'Connell
80 P.2d 749 (California Court of Appeal, 1938)
Evans v. City of American Falls
11 P.2d 363 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1932)
Watson v. Lawson
135 P. 971 (California Supreme Court, 1913)