Treat v. Hiles

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Treat v. Hiles

45 N.W. 221, 76 Wis. 367, 1890 Wisc. LEXIS 117

DecidedApril 8, 1890

StatusPublished

This text of 45 N.W. 221 (Treat v. Hiles) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Treat v. Hiles, 45 N.W. 221, 76 Wis. 367, 1890 Wisc. LEXIS 117 (Wis. 1890).

Pincite

Opinion

By the Court.

Motion to review and correct the taxation of costs by the clerk on the dismissal of the defendant’s appeal from an order. The appeal was dismissed for the reason that the order was not appealable. An item of $206.25, for printing the case, was allowed by the clerk, against defendant’s objection. This item was improperly allowed. No case was required on the appeal. It is the settled law of this state that an order denying a motion for judgment on a verdict is not appealable. This was such an order. The principle was laid down in Johannes v. Youngs, 42 Wis. 401, and has since been steadily adhered to. See cases cited in the opinion on dismissing the appeal, 75 Wis. 265.

The plaintiffs should have moved the court to dismiss the appeal before incurring the expense of. printing the case. The item of $206.25 must be stricken from the taxed bill.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court.

Motion to review and correct the taxation of costs by the clerk on the dismissal of the defendant’s appeal from an order. The appeal was dismissed for the reason that the order was not appealable. An item of $206.25, for printing the case, was allowed by the clerk, against defendant’s objection. This item was improperly allowed. No case was required on the appeal. It is the settled law of this state that an order denying a motion for judgment on a verdict is not appealable. This was such an order. The principle was laid down in Johannes v. Youngs, 42 Wis. 401, and has since been steadily adhered to. See cases cited in the opinion on dismissing the appeal, 75 Wis. 265.

The plaintiffs should have moved the court to dismiss the appeal before incurring the expense of. printing the case. The item of $206.25 must be stricken from the taxed bill.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

45 N.W. 221, 76 Wis. 367, 1890 Wisc. LEXIS 117, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/treat-v-hiles-wis-1890.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack