Treat v. Hiles

45 N.W. 221, 76 Wis. 367, 1890 Wisc. LEXIS 117
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Treat v. Hiles. Read the opinion of the Court — 81 Wis. 280
Wisconsin Supreme Court·Decided April 8, 1890·Published

Opinion

By the Court.

Motion to review and correct the taxation of costs by the clerk on the dismissal of the defendant’s appeal from an order. The appeal was dismissed for the reason that the order was not appealable. An item of $206.25, for printing the case, was allowed by the clerk, against defendant’s objection. This item was improperly allowed. No case was required on the appeal. It is the settled law of this state that an order denying a motion for judgment on a verdict is not appealable. This was such an order. The principle was laid down in Johannes v. Youngs, 42 Wis. 401, and has since been steadily adhered to. See cases cited in the opinion on dismissing the appeal, 75 Wis. 265.

The plaintiffs should have moved the court to dismiss the appeal before incurring the expense of. printing the case. The item of $206.25 must be stricken from the taxed bill.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Treat v. Hiles, 45 N.W. 221, 76 Wis. 367, 1890 Wisc. LEXIS 117 (Wis. 1890).

45 N.W. 221 (Treat v. Hiles) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Johannes v. Youngs
42 Wis. 401 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1877)
Treat v. Hiles
44 N.W. 1088 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1889)