Treasurer & Receiver General v. City of Fitchburg

129 N.E. 454, 237 Mass. 359, 1921 Mass. LEXIS 866
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedJanuary 19, 1921
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 129 N.E. 454 (Treasurer & Receiver General v. City of Fitchburg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Treasurer & Receiver General v. City of Fitchburg, 129 N.E. 454, 237 Mass. 359, 1921 Mass. LEXIS 866 (Mass. 1921).

Opinion

Bealey, J.

It is settled by Needham, v. Fitchburg, ante, 354, that on the agreed facts in the present case, Hinds, during the time he was an inmate of the tuberculosis department of the “Lakeville State Sanatorium,” had his legal settlement in the defendant city. It having been agreed that no security was given for his support, nor any payment made therefor, and the amount not being in dispute, judgment for the plaintiff should be entered. St. 1902, c. 213, as amended by St. 1907, c. 386. St. 1907, c. 474, § 10, as amended by St. 1912, c. 17, § 1.

So ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State & Federal Control of Milk Prices & Practices
44 Pa. D. & C. 389 (Pennsylvania Department of Justice, 1942)
Town of Lakeville v. City of Cambridge
25 N.E.2d 757 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1940)
Byers, Exr. v. Beddow
142 So. 894 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1932)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
129 N.E. 454, 237 Mass. 359, 1921 Mass. LEXIS 866, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/treasurer-receiver-general-v-city-of-fitchburg-mass-1921.