Treasurer & Receiver General v. City of Fitchburg

129 N.E. 454, 237 Mass. 359, 1921 Mass. LEXIS 866
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided January 19, 1921·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Bealey, J.

It is settled by Needham, v. Fitchburg, ante, 354, that on the agreed facts in the present case, Hinds, during the time he was an inmate of the tuberculosis department of the “Lakeville State Sanatorium,” had his legal settlement in the defendant city. It having been agreed that no security was given for his support, nor any payment made therefor, and the amount not being in dispute, judgment for the plaintiff should be entered. St. 1902, c. 213, as amended by St. 1907, c. 386. St. 1907, c. 474, § 10, as amended by St. 1912, c. 17, § 1.

So ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Treasurer & Receiver General v. City of Fitchburg, 129 N.E. 454, 237 Mass. 359, 1921 Mass. LEXIS 866 (Mass. 1921).

129 N.E. 454 (Treasurer & Receiver General v. City of Fitchburg) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State & Federal Control of Milk Prices & Practices
44 Pa. D. & C. 389 (Pennsylvania Department of Justice, 1942)
Town of Lakeville v. City of Cambridge
25 N.E.2d 757 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1940)
Byers, Exr. v. Beddow
142 So. 894 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1932)