Treasurer of Champaign County v. Norton
This text of 1 Ohio 270 (Treasurer of Champaign County v. Norton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
*On the second ground, it was the opinion of the court that neither the submission nor the report were vacated by the appeal, but that the report was open to the same exceptions as in the court below. Motion overruled.
The defendant then took sundry exceptions to the report, some of which were sustained ; and it appearing that payments had been made by the defendant for the benefit of the estate, which had not been submitted to the commissioner, in consequence of the vouchers not being in the possession of defendant, the ease was referred to the same commissioner for re-examination and report at the next term.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 Ohio 270, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/treasurer-of-champaign-county-v-norton-ohio-1824.