Treadwell v. Holloway

46 Cal. 547
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1873
DocketNo. 3,875
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 46 Cal. 547 (Treadwell v. Holloway) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Treadwell v. Holloway, 46 Cal. 547 (Cal. 1873).

Opinion

By the Court:

The question made by counsel as to whether, upon the facts appearing, the debt from the defendants to the plaintiffs “ was created by fraud ” need not be considered. Whether originating in fraud or not, it is clear that it rusulted from .transactions of a fiduciary character. The thirty-third section of the Bankrupt Act provides that no [549]*549debt created by the fraud or embezzlement of the bankrupt, or by his defalcation as a public officer, or while acting in any fiduciary character, shall be discharged under its provisions.

Judgment reversed and cause remanded, with directions to render judgment for the plaintiffs according to the stipulation.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Royal Indemnity Co. v. Sherman
269 P.2d 123 (California Court of Appeal, 1954)
Crosby v. Miller, Vaughn & Co.
55 A. 328 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1903)
Mayberry v. Cook
54 P. 95 (California Supreme Court, 1898)
Herrlich v. McDonald
22 P. 299 (California Supreme Court, 1889)
Zeperink v. Card
11 F. 295 (E.D. Missouri, 1882)
Woolsey v. Cade
54 Ala. 378 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1875)
Flanagan v. Pearson
42 Tex. 1 (Texas Supreme Court, 1874)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
46 Cal. 547, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/treadwell-v-holloway-cal-1873.