Treadwell Original Drifters, LLC v. Original Drifters, Inc.

678 F. App'x 90
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 24, 2017
DocketNo. 16-1200
StatusPublished

This text of 678 F. App'x 90 (Treadwell Original Drifters, LLC v. Original Drifters, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Treadwell Original Drifters, LLC v. Original Drifters, Inc., 678 F. App'x 90 (4th Cir. 2017).

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Treadwell Original Drifters, LLC, appeals the district court’s order granting Original Drifters, Inc.’s motion for summary judgment. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the joint appendix and conclude that the district court did not err in applying the doctrine of collateral estop-pel. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Treadwell Original Drifters, LLC v. Original Drifters, Inc., No. 1:15-cv-00580-LO-TCB, 2016 WL 5899289 (E.D. Va. filed Jan. 28, 2016 & entered Jan. 29, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and- legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
678 F. App'x 90, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/treadwell-original-drifters-llc-v-original-drifters-inc-ca4-2017.