Treadway v. James

57 Cal. 137
California Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 1880·No. No. 6,884·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Thornton, J.:

The plaintiffs in this case showed that they were entitled to at least nominal damages. Their cattle, when in a very poor condition, and in a dry season when there was no food for them except at a distance, were excluded by the defendants from land where the plaintiffs had a right to have them, from which a cause of action arose, and by which they suffered some damage. The nonsuit was improperly granted, and the judgment and order denying defendants’ motion for a new trial are consequently reversed, and the cause remanded for a new trial.

Sharpstein, J., and Myrick, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Treadway v. James, 57 Cal. 137 (Cal. 1880).

57 Cal. 137 (Treadway v. James) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pacific Pine Lumber Co. v. Western Union Telegraph Co.
56 P. 103 (California Supreme Court, 1899)