Treadway v. Drybread

Indiana Supreme Court

Treadway v. Drybread

4 Blackf. 20, 1835 Ind. LEXIS 15

DecidedMay 27, 1835

StatusPublished

This text of 4 Blackf. 20 (Treadway v. Drybread) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Treadway v. Drybread, 4 Blackf. 20, 1835 Ind. LEXIS 15 (Ind. 1835).

Pincite

Opinion

SUIT by the assignee against the assignor of a promissory note. The plaintiff had obtained judgment against the maker, and sued out a fieri facias, which was returned nulla bona. Held, that as the plaintiff had held the note 14 months after it became due, before he brought the suit, and gave no satisfactory reason for the"delay, he had been guilty of gross negligence, and ought not to recover against the assignor. M’Kinney v. M’Connel, 1 Bibb, 239.—M’Ginnis v. Burton, 3 id. 6.— Campbell v. Hopson, 1 Marsh. 228.—Merriman v. Maple, 2 Blackf. 350.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SUIT by the assignee against the assignor of a promissory note. The plaintiff had obtained judgment against the maker, and sued out a fieri facias, which was returned nulla bona. Held, that as the plaintiff had held the note 14 months after it became due, before he brought the suit, and gave no satisfactory reason for the"delay, he had been guilty of gross negligence, and ought not to recover against the assignor. M’Kinney v. M’Connel, 1 Bibb, 239.—M’Ginnis v. Burton, 3 id. 6.— Campbell v. Hopson, 1 Marsh. 228.—Merriman v. Maple, 2 Blackf. 350.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

4 Blackf. 20, 1835 Ind. LEXIS 15, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/treadway-v-drybread-ind-1835.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack