Treadway v. Commissioner

1984 T.C. Memo. 153, 47 T.C.M. 1375, 1984 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 519
CourtUnited States Tax Court
DecidedMarch 28, 1984
DocketDocket No. 12533-79.
StatusUnpublished

This text of 1984 T.C. Memo. 153 (Treadway v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Tax Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Treadway v. Commissioner, 1984 T.C. Memo. 153, 47 T.C.M. 1375, 1984 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 519 (tax 1984).

Opinion

LONNIE CHARLES TREADWAY AND PATSY H. TREADWAY, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
Treadway v. Commissioner
Docket No. 12533-79.
United States Tax Court
T.C. Memo 1984-153; 1984 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 519; 47 T.C.M. (CCH) 1375; T.C.M. (RIA) 84153;
March 28, 1984.
Charles E. Craze*520 and Brian Thompson, for the petitioners.
Kathleen L. Midian, for the respondent.

HAMBLEN

MEMORANDUM FINDINGS OF FACT AND OPINION

HAMBLEN, Judge: Respondent determined a deficiency in the amount of $604.35 in petitioners' 1976 individual Federal income tax. The sole issue for determination is whether petitioners are liable for self-employment tax under section 1401 1 with respect to income received for services as an ordained minister.

Some of the facts have been stipulated and are found accordingly. The stipulation of facts and attached exhibits are incorporated herein by this reference.

Petitioners Lonnie Charles Treadway and Patsy H. Treadway 2 resided in Beaumont, Texas, when they filed their joint Federal 1976 income tax return with the Internal Revenue Service Center at Austin, Texas, and when they filed their petition in this case. In 1967, petitioner was ordained by the United Pentecostal Church. Based on his religious beliefs and principles, petitioner conscientiously objects*521 both to the payment of self-employment taxes and to accepting benefits from the Social Security system. Petitioner claims he is exempt from these taxes because he timely filed and attached to his 1968 Federal income tax return Form 4361, Application for Exemption from Self-Employment Tax for Use by Ministers, Members of Religious Orders, and Christian Science Practitioners, requesting exemption from the tax. He argues that, in any event, application of such tax to him would be unconstitutional. In 1969, in relation to his 1968 income taxes, petitioner filled out a Form 4361, requesting an exemption from self-employment. Petitioner gave the signed form to his CPA, who did not testify at trial. The Internal Revenue Service has no record that the Form 4361 was ever filed and his 1968 return was destroyed. On his 1976 Federal income tax return, petitioner did not report any self-employment tax.

In his notice of deficiency, respondent determined that petitioner was liable for self-employment tax under section 1401. 3

*522 In section 1402(e)(1), an exemption to the general rule of section 1401 is provided for ministers, which is limited by a timely filing requirement. 4 When a Form 4361 is filed requesting an exemption under the statute, it is retained by the Internal Revenue Service Center in a permanent alphabetical file. Internal Revenue Manual, Records Administration par. 110(5)77, and Correspondence par. 35(44)(36)(9)(b)(6). If the Form 4361 is attached to a return when received by the Internal Revenue Service, the form is detached from the return for processing. Internal Revenue Manual, Correspondence par. 35(44)(36)(2)(b).

*523 Petitioner bears the burden of proof in showing that his Form 4361 was timely filed, and that the respondent's determination is erroneous. Welch v. Helvering,290 U.S. 111 (1933); Rule 142(a), Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure. The Form 4361 completed by petitioner was given to his CPA, and petitioner did not show the form was ever filed with the Internal Revenue Service. The statute and the regulations clearly establish that the time limitations of section 1402(e) are mandatory and must be strictly complied with. 5 Because a search of their records by the respondent for petitioner's Form 4361 failed to discover the form and since petitioner failed to carry his burden of proof to show the form was filed, we find that petitioner did not timely file a request for exemption as required by section 1402(e).

Petitioner also attempts to refute his liability for self-employment tax by attacking the constitutionality of applying to him the provisions of sections 1401 and 1402. However, the constitutionality of the self-employment tax is well established. Cain v. United States,211 F.2d 375 (5th Cir. 1954),*524 cert. denied, 347 U.S. 1013 (1954); Palmer v. Commissioner,52 T.C. 310 (1969).

In United States v. Lee,455 U.S. 252, 258-259 (1982), the Supreme Court held that FICA taxes did not violate First Amendment

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Welch v. Helvering
290 U.S. 111 (Supreme Court, 1933)
Braunfeld v. Brown
366 U.S. 599 (Supreme Court, 1961)
United States v. Lee
455 U.S. 252 (Supreme Court, 1982)
Cain v. United States
211 F.2d 375 (Fifth Circuit, 1954)
Palmer v. Commissioner
52 T.C. 310 (U.S. Tax Court, 1969)
Henson v. Commissioner
66 T.C. 835 (U.S. Tax Court, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1984 T.C. Memo. 153, 47 T.C.M. 1375, 1984 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 519, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/treadway-v-commissioner-tax-1984.