Treadaway v. Harris

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Treadaway v. Harris

130 S.E. 827, 34 Ga. App. 583, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 428

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided November 10, 1925·No. 16639·Published

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

The court did not err in its rulings on the pleadings, and properly overruled the motion to dismiss the petition.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and Luke, J., concur. E. P. Treadaway, Lamar Camp, L. A. Dean, for plaintiff in error,

cited: 12 Euling Case Law, 642, par. 149, notes 9 and 10; 61 Ga. 602 (3); 7 Ga. 246, 257-8; Civil Code (1910), § 5576; 133 Ga. 493, 496; 126 Ga. 196, 201; 95 U. S. 3, 9; 154 U. S. 631.

Maddox, Matthews & Owens, Willingham, Wright & Covington, contra,

cited: 61 Ga. 602 (3), 607; 68 N. E. 676 (4); 7 C. J. 113; Bankrupt act, 1898, sec. 70-a (4), 67-e; Civil Code (1910), § 5576; 143 Eed. 201 (2); 152 Fed. 41, 52; 100 U. S. 100.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bloodworth, J.

The court did not err in its rulings on the pleadings, and properly overruled the motion to dismiss the petition.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and Luke, J., concur. E. P. Treadaway, Lamar Camp, L. A. Dean, for plaintiff in error,

cited: 12 Euling Case Law, 642, par. 149, notes 9 and 10; 61 Ga. 602 (3); 7 Ga. 246, 257-8; Civil Code (1910), § 5576; 133 Ga. 493, 496; 126 Ga. 196, 201; 95 U. S. 3, 9; 154 U. S. 631.

Maddox, Matthews & Owens, Willingham, Wright & Covington, contra,

cited: 61 Ga. 602 (3), 607; 68 N. E. 676 (4); 7 C. J. 113; Bankrupt act, 1898, sec. 70-a (4), 67-e; Civil Code (1910), § 5576; 143 Eed. 201 (2); 152 Fed. 41, 52; 100 U. S. 100.

Treadaway v. Harris, 130 S.E. 827, 34 Ga. App. 583, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 428 (Ga. Ct. App. 1925).

Pincite

130 S.E. 827 (Treadaway v. Harris) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related