Trazell I v. Penn National Gaming, Inc.

622 F. App'x 270
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 19, 2015·No. No. 15-2076·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Trazell I appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his discrimination suit for failure to state a claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, deny Trazell I’s motion for injunctive relief, and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Trazell I v. Penn National Gaming, Inc., No. 3:15-ev-00085-GMG-RWT (N.D.W.Va. Aug. 31, 2015). We dis[271] pense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Trazell I v. Penn National Gaming, Inc., 622 F. App'x 270 (4th Cir. 2015).

622 F. App'x 270 (Trazell I v. Penn National Gaming, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.