Traynor v. Mouser Electronics, Inc.

S.D. New York

Traynor v. Mouser Electronics, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided January 14, 2020·No. 1:19-cv-08950·Unknown

Opinion

DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DOC#: SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DATE FILED: (U/C

YASEEN TRAYNOR, also known as YASEEN TRAYLOR, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, No. 19-CV-8950 (RA) ORDER V. MOUSER ELECTRONICS, INC., Defendant.

RONNIE ABRAMS, United States District Judge: It has been reported to the Court that this case has been settled. Accordingly, it is hereby: ORDERED that the above-captioned action is discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to this Court’s docket if the application to restore the action is made within sixty (60) days. Any application to reopen this action must be filed within sixty (60) days of this order, and any application filed thereafter may be denied solely on that basis. If the parties seek to have the Court retain jurisdiction to enforce a settlement agreement, the terms of the agreement must be placed on the public record and “so ordered” by the Court within the same thirty-day period. See Hendrickson v. United States, 791 F.3d 354, 358 (2d Cir. 2015). It is further ORDERED that the initial conference scheduled for January 17, 2020 is hereby adjourned sine die. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close this case. SO ORDERED. Dated: January 14, 2020 New York, New York Ronnie Abrams United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DOC#: SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DATE FILED: (U/C

YASEEN TRAYNOR, also known as YASEEN TRAYLOR, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, No. 19-CV-8950 (RA) ORDER V. MOUSER ELECTRONICS, INC., Defendant.

RONNIE ABRAMS, United States District Judge: It has been reported to the Court that this case has been settled. Accordingly, it is hereby: ORDERED that the above-captioned action is discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to this Court’s docket if the application to restore the action is made within sixty (60) days. Any application to reopen this action must be filed within sixty (60) days of this order, and any application filed thereafter may be denied solely on that basis. If the parties seek to have the Court retain jurisdiction to enforce a settlement agreement, the terms of the agreement must be placed on the public record and “so ordered” by the Court within the same thirty-day period. See Hendrickson v. United States, 791 F.3d 354, 358 (2d Cir. 2015). It is further ORDERED that the initial conference scheduled for January 17, 2020 is hereby adjourned sine die. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close this case. SO ORDERED. Dated: January 14, 2020 New York, New York Ronnie Abrams United States District Judge

Traynor v. Mouser Electronics, Inc., (S.D.N.Y. 2020).

Pincite

Traynor v. Mouser Electronics, Inc. (Traynor v. Mouser Electronics, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related