Traynham & Bay v. Brown

74 Ga. 410
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 13, 1885
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 74 Ga. 410 (Traynham & Bay v. Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Traynham & Bay v. Brown, 74 Ga. 410 (Ga. 1885).

Opinion

A bill was filed against two defendants, one a resident and the other a non-resident. Service was perfected on the non-resident by publication, and personally on the resident. On demurrer by the latter, the bill was dismissed and complainants excepted. Service of the bill of exceptions was acknowledged by attorneys representing the resident defendant, and an entry was made by the sheriff that the other defendant could not be found, lived out of the state, and had no attorney on whom to make service:

Held, that, in order to give the Supreme Court jurisdiction, the bill of exceptions must be served in some one of the ways pointed out by the statute. No provision is made for an entry of non est inventus; and, on motion, the case will be dismissed

Writ of error dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Swafford v. Shirley
66 S.E. 1022 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1910)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
74 Ga. 410, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/traynham-bay-v-brown-ga-1885.