Traylor v. State

795 S.W.2d 361, 303 Ark. 287, 1990 Ark. LEXIS 434
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Traylor v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 304 Ark. 174
Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided October 1, 1990·No. CR 90-119·Published

Opinion

Dale Price, Justice.

The appellant was convicted of breaking or entering, theft of property, and of being a felon in possession of a firearm. He raises six issues on appeal. Five of those issues involve direct attacks on his conviction. We consider only the sixth issue in which the appellant claims the trial court should have ordered a new trial due to ineffective assistance of counsel.

Less than thirty days after his conviction, the appellant filed a motion for a new trial asserting that his representation at trial had been inadequate. See A.R.Cr.P. Rule 36.4. The motion was filed in . a timely manner and new counsel was appointed. However, the record does not reflect that the motion was ever acted upon by the trial court. Therefore, as in Mobbs v. State, 303 Ark. 98, 792 S.W.2d 601 (1990), we do not reach the merits of the case. We remand to the trial court for consideration of the post-conviction motion.

Remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Traylor v. State, 795 S.W.2d 361, 303 Ark. 287, 1990 Ark. LEXIS 434 (Ark. 1990).

795 S.W.2d 361 (Traylor v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mobbs v. State
792 S.W.2d 601 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1990)