Traylor v. Atlanta, Birmingham & Coast Railroad

168 S.E. 788, 46 Ga. App. 661, 1933 Ga. App. LEXIS 165
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMarch 24, 1933
Docket22786
StatusPublished

This text of 168 S.E. 788 (Traylor v. Atlanta, Birmingham & Coast Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Traylor v. Atlanta, Birmingham & Coast Railroad, 168 S.E. 788, 46 Ga. App. 661, 1933 Ga. App. LEXIS 165 (Ga. Ct. App. 1933).

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

Traylor sued the defendant railroad company for personal injuries, and his testimony was the only evidence adduced. Upon the conclusion of his testimony, the court, on motion of counsel for the defendant, awarded a nonsuit. The plaintiff’s testimony failed to prove his case as laid, and the judgment awarding a nonsuit was not error for any reason assigned. See Meeks v. A. & B. R. Co., 122 Ga. 266 (50 S. E. 99), and Southern Ry. Co. v. Nichols, 135 Ga. 11 (5) (68 S. E. 789), where the facts were quite similar to those of the instant case.

Judgment affirmed.

MacIntyre and Guerry, jj., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Meeks v. Atlantic & Birmingham Railroad
50 S.E. 99 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1905)
Southern Railway Co. v. Nichols
68 S.E. 789 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1910)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
168 S.E. 788, 46 Ga. App. 661, 1933 Ga. App. LEXIS 165, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/traylor-v-atlanta-birmingham-coast-railroad-gactapp-1933.