Traylor, Eric Benjamin
This text of Traylor, Eric Benjamin (Traylor, Eric Benjamin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-92,390-01
EX PARTE ERIC BENJAMIN TAYLOR, Applicant
ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. DC-F201700359-A IN THE 413TH DISTRICT COURT FROM JOHNSON COUNTY
Per curiam.
ORDER
Applicant was convicted of capital murder of a person under ten years of age and sentenced
to life without parole. The Thirteenth Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. Taylor v. State, No.
13-18-00338-CR (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi-Edinburg, Apr. 9, 2020). Applicant filed this
application for a writ of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and the district clerk forwarded
it to this Court. See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07.
Applicant contends that appellate counsel failed to timely inform Applicant that his
conviction had been affirmed and advise him of his right to file a pro se petition for discretionary
review. Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Ex parte Wilson, 956
S.W.2d 25 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997); Ex parte Crow, 180 S.W.3d 135 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). 2
Accordingly, the record should be developed. The trial court is the appropriate forum for findings
of fact. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d). The trial court shall order appellate counsel to
respond to Applicant’s claim. In developing the record, the trial court may use any means set out
in Article 11.07, § 3(d). If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether
Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wants to be represented by counsel, the trial court
shall appoint counsel to represent him at the hearing. See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04. If
counsel is appointed or retained, the trial court shall immediately notify this Court of counsel’s
name.
The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether appellate
counsel timely informed Applicant that his conviction had been affirmed and that he had a right to
file a pro se petition for discretionary review. The trial court shall also determine whether Applicant
would have timely filed a petition for discretionary review but for appellate counsel’s alleged
deficient performance. The trial court may make any other findings and conclusions that it deems
appropriate in response to Applicant’s claim.
The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law within ninety days from
the date of this order. The district clerk shall then immediately forward to this Court the trial court’s
findings and conclusions and the record developed on remand, including, among other things,
affidavits, motions, objections, proposed findings and conclusions, orders, and transcripts from
hearings and depositions. See TEX . R. APP . P. 73.4(b)(4). Any extensions of time must be requested
by the trial court and obtained from this Court.
Filed: April 14, 2021 Do not publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Traylor, Eric Benjamin, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/traylor-eric-benjamin-texcrimapp-2021.