Traydon v. Traydon
This text of 66 So. 3d 409 (Traydon v. Traydon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The Court has determined that because the order on appeal fails to bring the judicial labor to an end with regard to non-collateral matters, the appeal is premature. See, e.g., Hoffman v. O’Connor, 802 So.2d 1197 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002) (dismissing appeal from dissolution order that was not final because it reserved jurisdiction to *410 determine equitable distribution). Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
66 So. 3d 409, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 12242, 2011 WL 3341440, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/traydon-v-traydon-fladistctapp-2011.