Traydon v. Traydon

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Traydon v. Traydon

66 So. 3d 409, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 12242, 2011 WL 3341440

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 4, 2011·No. 1D11-2453·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The Court has determined that because the order on appeal fails to bring the judicial labor to an end with regard to non-collateral matters, the appeal is premature. See, e.g., Hoffman v. O’Connor, 802 So.2d 1197 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002) (dismissing appeal from dissolution order that was not final because it reserved jurisdiction to *410 determine equitable distribution). Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.

BENTON, C.J., LEWIS and WETHERELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The Court has determined that because the order on appeal fails to bring the judicial labor to an end with regard to non-collateral matters, the appeal is premature. See, e.g., Hoffman v. O’Connor, 802 So.2d 1197 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002) (dismissing appeal from dissolution order that was not final because it reserved jurisdiction to *410 determine equitable distribution). Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.

BENTON, C.J., LEWIS and WETHERELL, JJ., concur.

Traydon v. Traydon, 66 So. 3d 409, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 12242, 2011 WL 3341440 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

66 So. 3d 409 (Traydon v. Traydon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related